No. Infrastructure can be shared, proxied or compromised. Attribution requires corroborating evidence, and our reporting makes confidence levels and alternative explanations clear.

We identify the assets, sectors, regions and threat questions that deserve attention. The review records scope, dependencies and the evidence needed before implementation decisions are made.

We review sources, indicator quality, confidence and relevance before operational use. Findings are reviewed with the responsible team so access, operational impact and ownership are clear.

We investigate adversary behavior, campaigns and exposure patterns relevant to your organization. Implementation follows agreed acceptance criteria and approval points, with limitations documented.

We translate intelligence into hunting hypotheses, detection updates and practical briefings. Handover includes the responsibilities and review actions needed to keep the work useful over time.

The proposed deliverables include intelligence requirements and source plan; threat briefings with confidence and limitations; detection and hunting recommendations. The final statement of work defines the format, acceptance criteria and responsibilities for each deliverable.

An indicator feed alone cannot tell your team what to do next. We examine the source, freshness and relevance of intelligence, then connect it to your technologies and exposure. Reports separate observed evidence from analytical judgments and explain the actions that deserve investigation.

We first discuss your objective, current environment and operational constraints. The engagement follows collect signals, enrich context, assess relevance, and inform response. Access requirements, milestones and approval points are agreed before delivery.

Yes. We agree a responsibility matrix and communication process so your engineers, security team and service partners know who owns decisions, changes and follow-up actions. Ongoing support is included where specified in the agreed engagement.

Scope, environment size, access readiness, integration complexity and the level of implementation or ongoing support determine the proposal. We review those factors with you and agree milestones and fees before work begins.