Secure the application around your language model.
We help businesses assess and improve LLM applications, including retrieval, tool use and supporting infrastructure. Our service examines the full data and permission flow rather than relying on a prompt alone for protection.
How the service works.
./llm-security-review.sh --phase map-system --environment exampleLLM Security Framework services.
Threat modeling
Map users, data sources, model providers, retrieval layers and connected tools.
Application assessment
Review prompt injection paths, output handling and sensitive information exposure.
Access and tool controls
Apply least privilege, enforce authorization outside the model and define approvals.
Evaluation and operations
Build security tests, logging requirements, version review and response procedures.
Enforce trust boundaries outside the model.
An LLM should not decide whether a user is authorized to access a record or execute a privileged action. We review those decisions in the application and integration layers. Evaluation includes retrieved content, indirect inputs and tool permissions so controls are tested beyond normal conversation examples.
What you receive.
- LLM application threat model
- Security findings and control recommendations
- Adversarial evaluation and operations plan
How an engagement begins.
We begin with a scoping conversation about your environment, priorities and existing tools. We agree access, responsibilities, milestones and acceptance criteria before delivery. Our team then carries out the assessment, design or implementation work in scope, reviews findings with you and prepares a practical handover.
Your proposal defines the final deliverables, access requirements, service hours, response commitments and ongoing support responsibilities. Work can be phased around your priorities and approved change process.
Common questions.
Can you assess an existing RAG assistant?
Yes. The scope can include document ingestion, retrieval permissions, model configuration, output handling and connected tools, using authorized test data and agreed evaluation cases.
What does an LLM application threat model cover?
We map users, data sources, model providers, retrieval layers and connected tools. The review records scope, dependencies and the evidence needed before implementation decisions are made.
How do you assess prompt injection and data exposure risks?
We review prompt injection paths, output handling and sensitive information exposure. Findings are reviewed with the responsible team so access, operational impact and ownership are clear.
How are tool permissions and application authorization reviewed?
We apply least privilege, enforce authorization outside the model and define approvals. Implementation follows agreed acceptance criteria and approval points, with limitations documented.
How do you validate and monitor LLM security controls?
We build security tests, logging requirements, version review and response procedures. Handover includes the responsibilities and review actions needed to keep the work useful over time.
What deliverables are included in llm security framework services?
The proposed deliverables include lLM application threat model; security findings and control recommendations; adversarial evaluation and operations plan. The final statement of work defines the format, acceptance criteria and responsibilities for each deliverable.
How is the work tailored to our business?
An LLM should not decide whether a user is authorized to access a record or execute a privileged action. We review those decisions in the application and integration layers. Evaluation includes retrieved content, indirect inputs and tool permissions so controls are tested beyond normal conversation examples.
How do we get started with this service?
We first discuss your objective, current environment and operational constraints. The engagement follows map ai system, assess trust boundaries, apply safeguards, and test and monitor. Access requirements, milestones and approval points are agreed before delivery.
Can you work with our internal team or current providers?
Yes. We agree a responsibility matrix and communication process so your engineers, security team and service partners know who owns decisions, changes and follow-up actions. Ongoing support is included where specified in the agreed engagement.
What determines the project timeline and cost?
Scope, environment size, access readiness, integration complexity and the level of implementation or ongoing support determine the proposal. We review those factors with you and agree milestones and fees before work begins.
Let’s plan the right service for your business.
Tell us what you need to assess, build or improve. We’ll help define the scope and a practical next step.